The Background

North Korea has a pursued a militaristic nuclear program for decades and since 2006, the U.N. Security Council has passed a number of resolutions condemning North Korea's activities and calling on the country to cease its nuclear and missile programs. Starting in July 2017 North Korea renewed an aggressive campaign when it conducted two tests of its Hwasong-14 missile. In August, they fired a ballistic missile directly over Japan into the Pacific. The following September, North Korea detonated what it claims was a thermonuclear bomb and launched another missile over Japan. In November, they test-fired its new Hwasong-15, a missile which analysts believe could have reached the entirety of the U.S. mainland, depending on the weight of the warhead. These actions are not only reckless, they run contrary to international law.

As North Korea's capabilities have grown, relations between the U.S. and North have been tumultuous. Soon after taking office, President Trump threatened North Korea with “fire and fury,” and warned that the U.S. would “totally destroy” the country, while characterizing the pursuit of a diplomatic solution as a “waste of time.” However, a year later, Trump agreed to meet with Kim Jong Un at a summit in Singapore where he touted that they “fell in love”. Trump’s sudden change in rhetoric is somewhat indicative of U.S. policy toward the North, which has been characterized as one of “maximum pressure and engagement,” in which sanctions and diplomacy are used to reduce the regime’s nuclear activity.

Trump and Kim’s June summit was a reversal of long-standing U.S. policy which designates denuclearization as a precondition for any meeting between the two heads of state. It concluded with a vague joint statement in which North Korea agreed to return the remains of American POWs and work toward "complete denuclearization". However, experts worry that the agreement’s lack of detail will lead to unrealistic expectations from one or both sides, ultimately causing talks to fall through entirely as they have in the past.

Despite concerns, the Trump administration’s diplomatic attempts are a step in the right direction in light of earlier reports that indicated the White House had given serious consideration to an extraordinarily reckless “bloody nose” attack on the country. Experts agree that the U.S. lacks a viable military option against North Korea. Aside from massive casualties on the Korean Peninsula, including the deaths of thousands of American citizens, a conflict with North Korea could trigger a nuclear exchange, raising the death toll to millions and ushering in a years-long nuclear winter. While administration officials deny such a strategy exists, the fact that it was even considered is alarming.

The Latest

Since the June summit between President Trump and North Korean Chairman Kim Jong-un, very little progress has been made toward denuclearization of the Korean peninsula. A month after the summit, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo traveled to Pyongyang to continue the dialogue, intending to "fill in the details" of North Korean commitments to denuclearize, but he neither extracted new commitments nor met face-to-face with Chairman Kim. Additional meetings have taken place with similar results.

Meanwhile, North and South Korea have begun implementing measures outlined in the Pyongyang Joint Declaration, which was signed by the two sides in September. The agreement aims to ease tensions on the peninsula and includes commitments for the two Koreas to establish no-fly zones along the border, halt military drills close to the demilitarized zone (DMZ) between the two countries, and dismantle several guard posts inside the DMZ. They have also begun conducting a joint field study on connecting their railways, which would provide a significant economic benefit for the North if it denuclearized.

Following a series of rotating bilateral talks between the U.S., South Korea, and North Korea, President Trump will likely have his second meeting with Kim Jong Un early next year to continue discussions on denuclearization. Vice President Mike Pence has said that the United States will not require a complete list of nuclear weapons and missile sites from North Korea prior to the summit, despite recent satellite images of at least 13 undeclared and active missile testing sites. However, Pence also suggested that any new agreement will be more comprehensive than the last, saying that it is “absolutely imperative” for the U.S. to come out of the summit with a specific plan to identify and inspect weapons and development sites.


Call your senators at (202) 224-3121 and ask them to support the Preventing Preemptive War in North Korea Act (S. 2047), which states that, "No funds may be used for kinetic military operations in North Korea absent an imminent threat to the United States without express congressional authorization." Under the Constitution, Congress alone can authorize the use of military force. This important legislation, spearheaded by Senator Chris Murphy, reinforces that point.

  • You can also ask your congressional representatives to cosponsor the No Unconstitutional Strike against North Korea Act (H.R. 4837/S. 2016), which assert that only Congress can authorize U.S.-initiated military action against North Korea. We need lawmakers to express public support for a more effective U.S. diplomatic approach toward North Korea. These two bills offer a great way for them to do that.